I already shot this down. You have no evidence to support this. Look at the numbers, fool. I already shot this down. You have no evidence to support this. They would make progress in days and lose it in weeks. That is the way it has always worked. NATO has always planed on a defense in depth. Political hogwash because you lost the military argument. A lie. You are ignorant of how NATO works and what our well-known military strategy is. So what? An idiot understands that a maximum threat will require a maximum effort. What a fool you are.
The numbers show that as a percent of GDP. So why don't you look at the actual GDP of NATO countries and tell me how much they ALL spend outside of the already major powers........ Weeks? We couldn't deploy the forces necessary in weeks. Generals disagree with you bud. Is it? Bush was just as bad in this regard. Its the truth. Just as ISIS could be decimated in about 2 days. Unless you think we lack the capacity. Prove it. NATO's strategy is the US military. Unless you think NATO's 18,000 member force would do anything of significance. So keep your straw-mans in your pants next time. Are you the Pot or Kettle?
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Iraq was a sad search for non-existent WMD's that came after we had already toppled the Taliban government of Afghanistan and sent Al Qaeda to the caves. One thing Bush did right was act swiftly against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. CIA and SPEC OPS were on the ground in fifteen days swiftly followed by airpower and light anti-insurgency units and later by heavier units. I guess it was Obamas fault that Bush didn't get them there in 10 days. We can still get covert operatives and SPEC Ops in theater very fast and quickly followed up with light units that have been extensively modernized for global mobility.
Ridiculous. We have a nuclear deterrent force that is the best in the world. It has not been disarmed, you are outright lying. The military has been downsized under every President and Congress since Reagan. The Cold War is over and we have reconfigured the force for different kinds of fights. Give up you are making a fool of yourself.
You don't say Do you not think that shit was on the board in a quickness regardless of if it had anything to do with 9/11 or not? Of course it was, this was the reason to go and it still took over a year. I am going to go out on a limb and suspect that you have absolutely no idea what spec ops really do or how they work.
LOL Check the nuclear armament numbers since 2008. Here is a hint, its smaller. SO ill-informed. Again if you read, the Generals stated the force is TOO SMALL for the threats we face. Why? Well they pointed out a smaller force WOULD work if we kept up the modernization, but, as they stated, we haven't done that in an efficient manner because of world conflicts........ Again its all in the black in white you refuse to read.
Because you don't have a clue about me and it has nothing to do with my point. If you had point to make, you would make it. Instead you just put down people you disagree with.
