Rule on UT punt ?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by pensacola, Nov 6, 2006.

  1. khounba

    khounba Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,238
    Likes Received:
    489
    Can it be a muff if it wasn't the kick returner that muffed it?
     
  2. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    If the college rule is the same as the NFL rule, you are correct.

    http://chicagosports.chicagotribune...03992.story?coll=cs-bears-asktheref-headlines
     
  3. pharpe

    pharpe Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    328
    That's what I thought. Why would it not be a TD?
     
  4. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Makes sense to me.
     
  5. TigerWins

    TigerWins Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,666
    Likes Received:
    157
    Damn, searching through the NCAA rulebook was not much help. Did find this article from the Wisconsin/Illinois game about a muff punt. We know you can't advance a muff, but I think this answers the question about where the ball is spotted.

    It's where you recover the ball, not where it is muffed. It would have been an LSU TD.
     
  6. StaceyO

    StaceyO Football Turns Me On

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    15,643
    Likes Received:
    8,487
    Against A & M in the opening game of (I think) '95, an LSU player was hit in the back with a punt while going downfield to help with blocking. Our PR never even saw the ball because of it. A & M was awarded the ball at the spot where they recovered the ball.
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    It's a touchdown.

    From the 2006 NCAA Football Rules and Interpretations

    Rule 6-3-3
    Rule 6-3-4
    Rule 8-2-1-e
    If the ball was touched, then article 6-3-3 rules that the ball is live and can be recovered by anybody (a legal recovery). Exception 6-3-4 does not apply. Article 8-2-1-e rules that a legally recovered scrimage kick in the opponent's end zone is a touchdown.
     
  8. Tygrr

    Tygrr Win the West

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,044
    Likes Received:
    160
    That's simply an untrue statement. Replay works for the better in most situations, it occasionally doesn't work out how it should and that's when some call for the end of it. I personally like it, but they need to penalize those refs that review a play and still get it wrong.
     
  9. Tygrr

    Tygrr Win the West

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,044
    Likes Received:
    160
    The original angle made it very difficult to tell if he did indeed touch it, but the back angle should leave no doubt. I agree that in all angles that it's very difficult to see the actual contact, but the way the ball changed it's spinning direction, should leave no doubt.
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    The reaction of the player should leave little doubt. He pulled his hand away like it was scalded just at the moment the ball started tumbling differently.
     

Share This Page