Around the SEC Part II Coachroaches at Auburn?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by Mike in Memphis, Jul 28, 2008.

  1. Mike in Memphis

    Mike in Memphis Old Tiger

    Around the SEC Part II – Cockroaches at Auburn???
    From a Memphis, TN Commercial Appeal article about SEC Media Days ----
    The Link: http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/jul/26/spurrier-wants-more-this-season/

    About halfway down the article:

     
  2. GEAUX TIGERS

    GEAUX TIGERS Founding Member

    :angryfire:angryfire:angryfire
     
  3. LSUtiger327

    LSUtiger327 Pow right in da kissa

    at least he's honest. that's more than we can say for tubby telling us he doesn't teach his kids this.

    edit: actually i think there's a difference btwn cut blocking and chop blocking but it's lunch time.
     
  4. khounba

    khounba Founding Member

    Yeah cut blocks are legal as long as the defender isn't already being blocked. That's the part Auburn has trouble with.
     
  5. TwistedTiger

    TwistedTiger Founding Member

    Exactly. Legal cut blocks are alright but Auburn has a tendency to use the illegal chop as well.
     
  6. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Cut blocks shouldn't be legal, certain some of these blocks can draw a big fine in the NFL. Teams that use cut-blocking routinely commit inadvertent chop blocks routinely, too. Way too much . . . Auburn got called on it several times last season.
     
  7. cadillacattack

    cadillacattack Illegitimi non carborundum est

    since when did 2 = "several?"
     
  8. paducahmichael

    paducahmichael Tiger Band Class of '73


    When they're on national TV in a BIG game and committed against a genuine star player, I think they count at least double. :wave:
     
  9. cadillacattack

    cadillacattack Illegitimi non carborundum est

    cool .... i like the "several" MNC trophies y'all have :thumb:
     
  10. paducahmichael

    paducahmichael Tiger Band Class of '73

    Thought maybe the good 'ole Webster's dictionary could help:


    Main Entry:1sev·er·al [​IMG]Pronunciation: \ˈsev-rəl, ˈse-və-\ Function:adjective Etymology:Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Medieval Latin separalis, from Latin separ separate, back-formation from separare to separateDate:15th century

    1 a: separate or distinct from one another <federal union of the several states> b (1): individually owned or controlled : exclusive <a several fishery> — compare common (2): of or relating separately to each individual involved <a several judgment> c: being separate and distinctive : respective <specialists in their several fields>2 a: more than one <several pleas> b: more than two but fewer than many <moved several inches>

    So, whether you count 2003 as one or as one-half, we have more than two, but fewer than many. We'll work on getting to the "many" stage.
     
    2 people like this.

Share This Page