1. Whatever you say. (or don't say)
    1 person likes this.
  2. Take your time, get back to me. ;) The search feature should help you out a lot.
  3. This hurts LSU in the computers.
  4. I have already laid out the thread and your exact posts above. You're confusing me today.
  5. Not as much as Kentucky losing. Although it doesn't matter, we win and we're in, that simple.
  6. Doesn't matter, as long as LSU keeps winning...
  7. They lost to... Georgia, right? If we end up playing Georgia, no problem. But yeah, if we win out we should be in good shape.
  8. You're right, and I was going to make that point except none of it really matters.
  9. But helps us in real life :D
    1 person likes this.
  10. First of all, I didn't realize you had linked a thread in that post. I wish Brett would set it up so that links are automatically underlined...makes it a lot easier to see them.

    But, back to the original statement. I've never said what you accused me of saying. In the posts you have linked I wasn't saying Saban doesn't lose games he shouldn't.

    As to your specific examples...

    "Record goes against that. The games you lost the last few years were games that any SEC team could have lost. In one breath one says that no game in the SEC is a given. But, when one exhales, they say otherwise."

    And...

    "Hey, call me looney. This appears to be just another way for people to try to discount the success Saban had at LSU. "Oh, he won us two SECC's and an MNC but he lost games he shouldn't and therefor his coaching ability is in question." People blame games on the refs calls, and occasionally, occasionally, (IE: OU vs Boise State last year) that is the case. But, more often than not, it is cases where people are reaching."

    Neither one of these quotes, from my posts, support your assertion.