Forums Register login What's New?
Question on conference realignment
?

Should the Big East Conference be allowed to retain their BCS bid?

  1. Yes. While the Big East is considerably weaker, they are still head and shoulders above any non-BCS

    1 vote(s)
    4.5%

  2. Yes. While the Big East is not necessarily better than C-USA or the MWC, they have some tradition,

    2 vote(s)
    9.1%

  3. Yes. There is no other alternative

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. No. Conference USA should replace them in the BCS

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  5. No. The Mountain West Conference should replace them in the BCS

    1 vote(s)
    4.5%

  6. Let's just fully restructure or totally scrap the BCS in favor of a different system that includes a

    18 vote(s)
    81.8%
  1. Should the Big East, with their new 2005 alignment, be allowed to keep it's BCS bid? Should another conference, the Mountain West or Conference USA, be given the chance instead?

    Here's the football Big East starting in 2005.

    Cincinatti
    Connecticut
    Louisville
    Pittsburgh
    Rutgers
    South Florida
    Syracuse
    West Virginia

    Gosh, that's a soft league. Can you honestly say that Conference USA and the Mountain West are much worse than this?
  2. how bout they lose there bid and they choose another at large team. That would make the most sense.
  3. I like that alternative the best. Once one of the other conferences proves itself worthy of an automatic bid, then maybe they can be voted into the BCS club.
(You have insufficient privileges to reply here.)