I'm not watching a 30-minute political speech that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

This country was founded upon religious liberty and she was expressing just that. Here is the ENTIRE quote . . .

"Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind."​

We are also free to judge a video and find it disgusting. Have you forgotten that? Here is the ENTIRE quote . . .

“This is a fairly volatile situation, and it is in response not to United States policy, obviously not to the administration, not to the American people. It is in response to a video, a film, that we have judged to be reprehensible and disgusting — that in no way justifies any violent reaction to it.”

"For other countries it can be difficult to understand why the United States allows such offensive speech as that displayed in the anti-Muhammad film. The United States does not seek to limit freedom of speech, even speech it finds offensive."

I'm simply pointing our your dishonesty in cherrypicking quotes out of context. The full quote shows that they did not attack free speech at all. They just exercised free speech in criticizing a bad film's content.

Romney is a liar and so are you. Nobody sympathized with those who waged the attacks. Exactly what statement suggests this?

"Let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind." Hillary Clinton

“This is a fairly volatile situation, and it is in response not to United States policy, obviously not to the administration, not to the American people. It is in response to a video, a film, that we have judged to be reprehensible and disgusting — that in no way justifies any violent reaction to it.” -- White House spokesman

Because they can exercise the right of free speech, too. Having the freedom to make a film does not absolve you from criticism. How very stupid of you.

None of these comments can be construed as a film review, they are simply opinions, freely expressed. Your examples are trite and dishonest.

We have the right of free speech to deplore anything that we wish. And you know it.

They did not say any view was sacred, you made that up. They did not endorse religious beliefs, they endorsed freedom of speech. They stated clearly that Americans uphold the freedom of expression even when they found it offensive. And this freedom of expression allows anyone, including the President, to criticize the free expression of others. Why are you against freedom of expression?

You are a liar and a dickhead. I have answered them all, you just don't like having your ass handed to you.

Deploring something is not forbidding something. You dishonestly only support free speech when it is something that you agree with. I deplore your insensitive attacks on the beliefs of others and it is my right to do so.

You ask questions to which there are no answers in a lame attempt to change the subject. I know of no instance in which the United States has deplored Salman Rushdie or Theo van Gogh. If you do, then please post the quotes here so that we may assess them.

But you can't can you?

You got nuthin'