You should. It’s the same sources you guys cite for “collusion”. So now the narrative is obstruction of nothing. Lol. Thy will claim he obstructed something which amounted to nothing. Ignoring the fact that he has the authority to fire anyone. For obstruction, you would have to prove Trump tried to obstruct an investigation to prevent the finding of crimes he committed. Kind of hard to do that when you aren’t being criminally investigated.
The president cannot be the target of a criminal probe as a sitting president is immune from indictment and criminal prosecution per the constitution. the statement means nothing for either pro or anti trump camps
Maybe. That’s what Nixon’s SP thought. I don’t believe it’s been tested in court. There are arguments he could be both a target and indicted. Probably the indictment would have to be held until he leaves office. He certainly can’t be removed except by impeachment in the House and convicted by the senate.....
It’s a win win for Trump supporters. No collusion = win and validated Trumps attack’s. Impeachment over a fake investigation with no collusion just sends the Democrat party further into the abiss.
I was pointing out that many here pooh pooh the Post as a source,.. unless they say something the Trumpets like no, that's your tilted opinion it never said Trump wasn't being criminally investigated, he most certainly is,.. the article said he wasn't a criminal target,.. and "that could change at any moment",.. though really like @kcal said, "the statement means nothing".
fuck the dems 16 indictments so far,.. my point is, collusion or no,.. ifff, for example, Trump is found to have laundered hundreds of $millions for his Russian oligarch mobster friends,.. that can't be ignored and Trump will get dumped. Don't act like this is over, it's not by a long shot.
