1. fanatic likes this.
  2. @Rex are you proud of your party being racist once again, this time in a way that could potentially kill people via a lack of medical attention based on race?
    fanatic likes this.
  3. Sure he's proud. His is the party that will refuse treatment to those who demand the right to choose whether or not to vaccinate. In the Dems' minds, those people have it coming. Of course, they'd never refuse treatment to a smoker who gets lung cancer, or an overeater who gets heart disease, or a drinker who gets liver disease....
    fanatic likes this.
  4. Noticed Rex has been a no show today. Tough questions asked, crickets for response.

    waiting-skeleton.gif
  5. I'll take SOMETHING ONLY A WHITE SUPREMACIST WOULD CRY ABOUT for 500, Alex.
  6. I'll take SOMETHING ONLY A MAN THAT HAS ONLY A BRAIN STEM WOULD SAY for $2 million, Alex. Alex I will also take WHAT PRESIDENT HAS SEXUALLY MOLESTED AN 8 YEAR OLD GIRL ON NATIONAL TV for $3 trillion.
  7. So Lame. That's what I expect someone without an intelligent response to say.
    shane0911 likes this.
  8. I answered the question. No, it is not "racist" to take race into account when people are impacted according to race. Nor was it "racist" to have affirmative action programs in education and jobs programs.

    What's more, typically, the OP lied when he said "whites need not apply". Why should I have even dignified this thread in the first place?
  9. Shouldn't it be be the tried and true triage method? The sickest get the treatment first,
  10. Alex I will take HOW CAN ANYONE WHO IS UNDIGNIFIED BE ABLE TO DIGNIFY ANYTHING for $6 trillion.

    Oh Alex one more. I will take HOW IS SOMEONE THAT USES RACE TO DECIDE WHO GETS A LIFE SAVING DRUG NOT BE CALLED A RACIST for $12 trillion.