what crime is that?

They need 4 more years to figure out.

By NY law prosecutors do not have to name that crime, nor prove its existence, only that the business fraud alleged is in furtherance of another crime.

Well that is false. If you can’t prove a crime then how do you suppose they convict?

Further, these are all about the porn lady payments. In which one is a convicted liar and the other, stormy, who says none of its true and is currently paying Donald Trump damages.

Is basically a charge 34 times different ways because he is throwing shit on the wall.

You will never admit that. We already can predict your song and dance.

The main guy is a convicted liar. Not hard to argue that one doofus.

My, oh my. Think about the absurd ramifications of your insinuation and get back to me.

by what logic does a crime legally exist if is is neither convicted nor charged ?

i see so for example in NY i could fill out a business form saying i bought a fax machine, but you can convict me on filling out a false form by not accusing me and not convicting me of actually spending that money on grenade launchers? even if the illegal arms trading is not named or accused or convicted and not within the jurisdiction of the court?

I recited it just as I read it. Go read it for yourself, idc.