1. if by cheap, you mean "costs more to sign-up for soccer than baseball and football combined", you're right

  2. wow. what genius insight
  3. to spice up the game i'd put small boxing gloves on players and allow punching other players at any time. Widen the goal to the entire width of the field.

    And where's the cheerleaders?
  4. I think the field might be too big.
  5. Does that red card result in the player that the ball hit in the shoulder geting tossed? Does Australia have to play a man down the rest of the game?

    ETA: Never mind. I heard 'em say the Aussies are playing a man down.
  6. Wow. Suprising turnout for soccer, imo.
  7. no no. if the field was smaller you would have a logjam in the middle. then no one would ever score.
  8. Yeah, true. You'd probably just end up with people kicking the shyt outta shins for a little while.
  9. Yes, because making a "T" with your hands is very intimidating...

    Why is someone bothered by this? In the opening rounds of the WC, winning isn't the point. Scoring points and advancing is the point.

    It's slightly smaller than the Lombardi. It's looks like four Oscars supporting the world. Kind of a lame point to argue and if you ask me, Reilly was struggling to complete a top ten list and thew this in the middle because he attempts lame humor to fill the space.

    If you're looking for excitement, how is knowing in advance how much time is left going to improve that? Isn't being surprised to know that your team has four more minutes to pull out the win or defend their win or break the tie more exciting than knowing in advance?

    Terrible. He should have stopped after the vuvuzelas...