Should the current run by the SEC be considered a dynasty? | Page 2 | TigerFan.com

stevescookin · Feb 12, 2011

I'm shocked that no one even mentioned the University of Southern California under coach Lane Kiffen...Oh, nevermind...I see it's "Dynasty" and not "Die Nasty"...oops my bad...sorry.

cadillacattack · Feb 12, 2011

Rwilliams said: ↑

What makes the sec so dominant? I would think that it has to start with the love of the game by the normal southerner. The kids start lil league ball very early and highschool ball is very popular. The kids play for years before even getting to highschool. Most of the sec recruits are from the south, Texas included. I would think kids growing up living football makes them the best in the country. The same can be said of baseball. We in the south enjoy a long mild fall and baseball games during the summer play late into the evening. I guess sports is more of a lifestyle in the south than in some other parts of the country
Click to expand...

our geographic advantage is highly underrated by the majority of fans in our own conference. In honest conversations I've had with fans from other conferences, they all recognize the huge advantage we have.

Competition breeds success.

Attack Tiger · Feb 12, 2011

Is it still considered racism when you're holding up a particular race? Hell, I don't care. The bottom line is that the majority of african americans still live in the deep south, and if we're being brutally honest, they are far superior athletes. They grow up here...fans of SEC ball...and can't wait to play. That ALONE is really the only reason the SEC is so successful. We get the pick of the litter...so to speak.