La JoP Refuses to Marry Mixed Race Couple

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by OkieTigerTK, Oct 16, 2009.

?

Should La JoP who refused to marry a mixed race couple be fired from his job as a JoP?

  1. Yes

    17 vote(s)
    68.0%
  2. No

    8 vote(s)
    32.0%
  1. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    I saw a black guy cut himself once and the blood was red. Could it be that underneath the epidermis we are all the same? Except for Obama. He's wired differently.
     
  2. tinsley

    tinsley Veteran Member

    i consider the extinction of the White Race horrible. I hate the thought of the U.S. and Canada becoming the Brazil of the North.

    tgsam
     
  3. mindy

    mindy Founding Member

    I don't think JoPs issue marriage licenses. They just sign them. I think you get the license from the Clerk of Court and then you have so many days to have your ceremony and have an offical and some witnesses sign it. So I don't think they were denied a marriage license, this JoP just declined to be the person to officiate their marriage. I am not certain of this though.

    Stupid and racist? Yes.

    Against the law? I don't know.

    Also, aren't JoPs in La elected officials? I seem to remember seeing them on a ballot. If so, if his constiutents are unhappy with his behavior then they need to have him recalled or just not vote for him next time he's up for election.
     
  4. mindy

    mindy Founding Member


    I consider it evolution.

    And if I'm right, you and your kind are going to be phased out.


    YIPEE!!
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. tinsley

    tinsley Veteran Member



    The White Race is being propagandized and legally*
    herded toward a brown oblivion from which it can never recover. Especially where children are concerned, there’s something intrinsically criminal about the systematic effort by government and the media to destroy white folks’ [FONT=&quot]Sense of Identity[/FONT]. Fortunately though, most whites still tend to avoid blacks whenever they can lawfully* do so. While "equal protection of the laws" is a Fourteenth Amendment, Law of the Land fact, claims of "color blindness" are pure political expediency, or self-deception, or both. In America today, pretense rules.
    Concerned whites would do well to focus their anti-miscegenation argument on something that is obviously unarguable. Other than myself, nobody that I know of does that . . . yet. Although statistically valid, the arguments about inherently inferior intelligence are demolished in the minds of many by simply trotting out an example of an intelligent black, whereas: An argument based on hair texture, eye color and complexion easily forces apologists and supporters of genetic race mixing to deny what their own senses tell them. It frustrates the "there's only one race, the human race" pretenders every time, quickly reducing them to ad hominem attacks and red herring blathering. When it comes to personal decisions that affect the possible extinction of the white race, " only skin deep" is surely deep enough.

    *Legal and lawful are not synonyms, and history is fraught with legal horrors. There is an ethical element in lawful that is absent in legal.

    END
     
  6. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    i believe someone's hood is showing. :rolleye33:
     
  7. tinsley

    tinsley Veteran Member

    I believe someone wants to "kill the messenger".

    tgsm
     
  8. col reb

    col reb Founding Member

    True....quotas are unconstitutional..................so they call them "goals" at least with the usps.
     
  9. tinsley

    tinsley Veteran Member

    Critical thinking can expose efforts to deceive. Take the Supreme Court for example: Their split decisions expose them for the posturing phonies that they really are.

    tgsam
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Why exactly does it need to?
     

Share This Page