And people wonder why the SEC is so tough

Latest Recruiting Class Rankings....


Rank School Total commits 5-star commits 4-star commits 3-star commits Ave. stars Points
1. Florida 24 4 11 8 3.75 2,597
2. Tennessee 27 5 7 14 3.59 2,461
3. Texas 22 2 14 5 3.77 2,439
4. :lsup: 24 0 16 7 3.63 2,182
5. Notre Dame 18 1 12 5 3.78 1,982
6. USC 13 4 8 1 4.23 1,943
7. South Carolina 29 0 12 13 3.28 1,846
8. Georgia 22 0 10 12 3.45 1,793
9. Auburn 21 0 9 10 3.33 1,685

 

The SEC isn't tough. Just ask anyone from the PAC-10 or Big-10. :lol:

 

U mean the Big-11???:hihi:

 

According to this guy, LSU is #7

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/recruiting/columns/story?columnist=luginbill_tom&id=2738848

 

And you can go to a different recruiting service and get a different ranking. But, the point is, a lot of teams from the SEC are recruiting machines. LSU is one of the best in the nation, under CNS, and under Miles.

 

Amen brother! I was not disagreeing; I just put out another source.

 

You know, I signed up for the ESPN Insider, but so far the only bonus is that they charge me $6 a month for access to premium articles and 2 issues of ESPN the Mag. I hate their recruiting coverage, it's all backwards and biased. Go with Rivals- they've got us 4th.

 

I wish college football could be more uniform in rankings of teams (AP, Harris, USA Today, BCS) and also in assigning *'s to recruits, in turn, ranking teams' recruiting. :angry:

 

Why? Recruiting rankings don't mean nearly as much.

Not to mention that objectivity is already a rarity in recruiting... the likelihood of seeing a blanket definition of it is nil.

 

I agree but why not let them "Not mean as much" in the same language?