1. i didnt have the attention span to read the article.
  2. I'll read it when you decide to engage us in a decent discussion. But, since you claim you'll never respond to Republican's posts, the discussion won't happen. I guess I don't have to read the article then! :thumb:
  3. I read it Saturday. There's nothing new in there and proves absolutely nothing.
  4. I didn't read the article, only the thread title. How can you "intentionally ignore" something? If you know about it you're not ignoring it. If you don't know about it, how can you "intentionally ignore" it? Just a thought.
  5. that makes no sense, sabanfan. of course can you can intentionally ignore something. next time your phone rings, just sit there and do nothing. thats intentionally ignoring.
  6. I didn't even click on the link once I saw it was the New York Times. Whats the point of reading a slanted article if you won't respond even when I refute it?
  7. What's going on in this thread?

    Also why do almost all of Rex's posts include this at bottom?

    "Last edited by Rex : "
  8. All right, Sir.
  9. You want to vote for Kerry?
    the same person who wants to give Iran Nuclear fuel while at the same time
    thinks that Nuclear weapons are his main concern? :confused:

    another flip flop? :shock: :lol:
    Your side of the Isle is a total joke this time, Dems should've convinced Al Gore to come back for another round. :dis:

    Look how many presidents ran and lost and came back and ran :dis:
    I'm not endorsing Al Gore but kerry is a joke :lol: :eek: