1. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-scandal-that-matters/ar-AApnODC?li=BBnb7Kz

    Just Trump and only Trump are the focus. Most of the media wont give this too much thought, though they will be forced to at some point.

    Yes, it is weird that Ms. Wasserman Schultz continued to shield Imran Awan to the end. Yes, the amounts of money, and the ties to Pakistan, are strange. Yes, it is alarming that emails show Imran Awan knew Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s iPad password, and that the family might have had wider access to the accounts of lawmakers on the House Intelligence and Foreign Affairs committees.

    Collusion?

    Yet even if this never adds up to a spy thriller, it outranks most of the media’s other obsessions. The government, under the inattentive care of Democrats, may have been bilked for ages by a man the FBI has alleged to be a fraudster. That’s the same government Democrats say is qualified to run your health care, reform your children’s schools, and protect the environment. They should explain this first.

    [​IMG]
    Winston1 and kcal like this.
  2. Distract much?
  3. I mean if you care, care about it all. Here, there is tangible evidence.
  4. if they're rotten throw em out
    el005639, LaSalleAve and HalloweenRun like this.
  5. Tangible evidence of what, exactly? Your author doesn't say.
  6. Read much? Its pretty clear what was laid out by the FBI. Go home. You are drunk.
  7. Really? What crime was laid out by the FBI against Wasserman Schultz? Name it, because it's not in your article.
  8. Its clear you don't read well.
  9. It's clear you make up shit and couldn't answer the question.
  10. Hypocrite much?