Red you hold on to a sliver of information that you think questionable because it comes from an anynomous source but ignore the mountain of information that has been shown and documented by a wide variety of sources. The NYT, WAPO, MSNBC, CNN have all provided massive information pointing to her involvement in compromising emails. It's like you're hanging on to a last straw before being lost in the storm.
This is a very interesting analysis and if accurate should be read with fear both in the HRC campaign and White House. "Will Hillary Clinton’s Emails Burn the White House?" http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...on-s-emails-burn-the-white-house.html?via=ios
ruh roh..... Former Clinton aide expected to plead the 5th in response to email inquiries by Elise Labott and David Wright Updated 5:26 AM ET, Thu September 3, 2015 | Video Source: CNN (CNN)A former State Department employee who worked on Hillary Clinton's private email server has informed Congress that he will invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid testifying before the House Select Committee on Benghazi and in response to other Congressional inquiries related to the server. On Monday, Mark MacDougall, the attorney for former State Department employee Bryan Pagliano, sent a letter to House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy indicating that Pagliano would assert his Fifth Amendment right not to appear before the Select Committee for a deposition on September 10, 2015. A copy of the letter was obtained by CNN. here's the rest.... http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/03/politics/clinton-aide-fifth-amendment-emails/
More details from Reuters on Clinton's emails. Note @red55 emails with heads of state, heads of foreign intelligence, foreign ministers etc are classified by definition and everyone she sent or received should have been classified. More importantly if she had been briefed on the rule as she claims she was she would know this. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/02/us-usa-election-clinton-idUSKCN0R22C120150902 Oh yes the shit is piling up and her shovel is getting smaller and smaller.
Come back when you have something new. No agency has said that they are investigating Hillary Clinton. Please feel free to link to any official source that says so. You keep imagining that allegations reported by those news outlets constitute facts. The NYT has already had to back off some of these anonymous allegations since they proved to be untrue. Not one of those emails was compromised by Hillary. Feel free to provide confirmation of any that were. They are NOW being redacted, as per SOP, because they have been requested for public release under FOIA. All of you guys like to tell me that damming information is out there, but when I ask you to document that, everyone scatters.
