Where the hell is isis when you need them

as much as anyone, he has proven in the past to have the balls to be that guy.

you just don't like the answer.

Exactly what has he done to be testicle-worthy? Dude is the poster child for RINO's. He's no more a Republican than Trump or McCain, IMO.

he was hired because of the Ashcroft hospital thing. I thought you would know that.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051500864.html

What balls did Comey need in that hospital room when the FBI staff was ordered to make sure he didn't get thrown out? He had the support of Ashcroft and Mueller. The entire dramatic tale has been from his perspective. The entire situation was an internal power struggle caused IMO, by Bush's typically power-based laissez-faire attitude about serious matters. He pushed things off so he could claim plausible deniability. The person in this situation who had huevos was Gonzales...he put it right back on Bush which of course brought down the shit fire on his own head.

Worth mentioning in detail although it was in tirk's earlier link to McCarthy's comment.

U.S. Code Title 18 - Part 1 - Chapter 37 - Paragraph

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.


You'll notice there is nothing in there about intent or security designation. Everybody who works with government, including contractors and suppliers, is responsible for protecting information they work with, regardless of whether it has a protective marking. Furthermore, to receive the clearance necessary to become SoS, he/she undergoes in depth training on document classification, transfer protocol and responsibilities of possession.

If a document, directive or memo isnt marked what must the person in control of that document, directive or memo presume it's classification to be?

Hint......it isn't declassified. It must be presumed to be the most sensitive until it is marked. Isn't that the standard that we should expect from such a high-level government official? Hell, I bet most folks here are more careful than that with their own jobs.

this is where the left has succeeded. Any non-left person is now conditioned to justify their vote or position when criticizing a legitimate subject of that side. Kinda like you cant say anything about a black person without justifying you arent a racist usually by saying something bad about a livingston parish or alabama redneck.

Classified email is not designated so after its marked as such. Its classified either way whether she removed the classification or not. Many seem to think otherwise.

That nigga robbed me. Probably going to use the money to buy meth from a Livingston Parish or Alabama redneck.

Guiliani shocked by failure to indict. Says Hillary is a serial leaker

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/rud...inton-fbi-email-scandal/2016/07/06/id/737371/