Forums Register login What's New?
Hillary's E-Mail (Breaking News: Smoking Gun Officially Announced)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 66 of 349
  3. The good stuff isn't kept where it was hacked. Those email servers run off the normal internet.
  4. Gotcha
  5. This whole episode is nauseating.
  6. Is this like Nixon's missing 18 minutes of tape?

    BREAKING: Cheryl Mills To Destroy Emails About Boss Hillary Clinton

    This all just surfaced in State Department’s status report filed today in response to Judge Sullivan’s order. Yesterday evening, State finally produced some correspondence between it and Hillary’s right and left hands—Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. It has not produced its correspondence with Mrs. Clinton, and it is now clear that Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills plan to thumb their noses at the Judge and the State Department. No one is “cooperating,” despite their empty rhetoric to the contrary. The correspondence that has been produced verifies that the State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else. It allowed Mrs. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and it kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible. It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Mrs. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts. And as Judge Emmet G. Sullivan bores toward the truth, more revelations continue to surface.

    http://observer.com/2015/08/breaking-cheryl-mills-to-destroy-emails-about-hillary-clinton/

  7. prove it. shady source.
  8. Is this red? Did you hack tirk's account?
  9. And despite the Obama administration’s countless claims that it knew nothing of her private account, the few emails already produced by Mrs. Clinton, and by Clinton consigliere Sidney Blumenthal,

    Who has a consigliere except for mafia bosses?
  10. Worse, it is a biased source. The author has written a book about corruption in the Justice Department, which she plugs in every article she writes. This opinion blog is full of innuendo and it has nothing to do with the Benghazi or State Department emails at all. It's about some Department of Justice pissing contest with the State Department over 13 emails totaling 19 pages. Hillary certified that the emails were turned over at the judges request. No smoking guns here.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/under...ertifies-email-handover-but-aides-212074.html

    State's decision to deem classified some of the emails on Clinton's server has also created a layer of complexity some may see as a Catch-22: if aides destroy the records, they could be seen as hindering ongoing investigations, but if they deliberately hang on to classified materials without authorization, they could be breaking the law.​
(You have insufficient privileges to reply here.)
Page 66 of 349
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.