Wow, you truly are an ignorant one. :dis:
Do I do any research??? Yeah, more than you know. You actually just proved my point further and didn't even know it. :dis:
Ok, try to keep up. I was responding to a comment about LSU having more hardware than UT. Unless I really need glasses, you just supported my argument that UT has more. The last time I checked, 3 is more than 2. :dis:
Furthermore, if you're gonna throw in 1908 for LSU than you mine as well throw in 1914,1918, 1941, 1947, 1950, 1961, 1963, 1968, and 1969 for Texas.
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/big12/texas/all_national_champs.php
But then again I guess you'd only provide dates that help your case. :dis:
WTF are you talking about here. Yes, I am correct, UT has way more conference "hardware" than LSU. That was the whole point of my response to the comment that LSU had more hardware. What on God's green earth does the Southwest Conf. being weak have to do with that. :dis:
Trust me buddy, I don't go by hype, I do research and post based on what I know about a program. If you knew anything about the history of UT football, you would know how storied the program is. FSU???? FSU didn't start winning till the 80's, before that they were mediocre. You really are clueless if you think FSU has greater tradition than UT. I should be the one asking you if you do any research before typing that hogwash you just typed. You have just displayed your ignorance of college football. No, Seriously, you did. :dis:
Click to expand...