Perrilloux on WAFB tonight... | Page 6 | TigerFan.com

raylsu · Jan 14, 2005

I-of-the-Tygrr said:

Wow, you truly are an ignorant one. :dis:

Do I do any research??? Yeah, more than you know. You actually just proved my point further and didn't even know it. :dis:

Ok, try to keep up. I was responding to a comment about LSU having more hardware than UT. Unless I really need glasses, you just supported my argument that UT has more. The last time I checked, 3 is more than 2. :dis:
Furthermore, if you're gonna throw in 1908 for LSU than you mine as well throw in 1914,1918, 1941, 1947, 1950, 1961, 1963, 1968, and 1969 for Texas.
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/big12/texas/all_national_champs.php
But then again I guess you'd only provide dates that help your case. :dis:

WTF are you talking about here. Yes, I am correct, UT has way more conference "hardware" than LSU. That was the whole point of my response to the comment that LSU had more hardware. What on God's green earth does the Southwest Conf. being weak have to do with that. :dis:

Trust me buddy, I don't go by hype, I do research and post based on what I know about a program. If you knew anything about the history of UT football, you would know how storied the program is. FSU???? FSU didn't start winning till the 80's, before that they were mediocre. You really are clueless if you think FSU has greater tradition than UT. I should be the one asking you if you do any research before typing that hogwash you just typed. You have just displayed your ignorance of college football. No, Seriously, you did. :dis:
Click to expand...

Not really any bigger douchebag on the board than you my friend. FSU was a mistake. You are correct on the fact that they didn't achieve greatness until later on. Okay, besides that fact...you are a f# moron.

You said that UT is one the top ten programs of all time. You look at what they've done and compare it to LSU...and it isn't that much more.

I think the relevance of the conference does matter. The Southwest conference was crap and winning it 28 times is about as monumental of a task as you brushing your teeth every morning...which may or may not happen on a regular basis, but whatever.

Seriously. You never understood this thread and then you jump in it with some BS comments. Take a hike f'er.

raylsu · Jan 14, 2005

I-of-the-Tygrr said:

Then you too are just as much in the dark about college football history as ray is. You guys only know about recent history and how they haven't lived up to hype, but their storied history is well known by those who have vast knowledge of college football. They are in fact a "true historically elite program" and that is why they are mentioned in the same breath. You can't let you hate for them blind you to the facts. Like them or hate them, they are one of the more storied programs...period. Deal with it.
Click to expand...

LOL...keep watching ESPN and going with what they say...classic. LOL. Douchebag.

Maybe you, Perrilloser, Mack Brown and Vince Young can all join in a circle je#k singing kumbaya once he gets there and celebrate all 28 of those now defunct Southwest Conference titles....:sob:

Tygrr · Jan 14, 2005

raylsu said:

Not really any bigger douchebag on the board than you my friend. FSU was a mistake. You are correct on the fact that they didn't achieve greatness until later on. Okay, besides that fact...you are a f# moron.

You said that UT is one the top ten programs of all time. You look at what they've done and compare it to LSU...and it isn't that much more.

I think the relevance of the conference does matter. The Southwest conference was crap and winning it 28 times is about as monumental of a task as you brushing your teeth every morning...which may or may not happen on a regular basis, but whatever.

Seriously. You never understood this thread and then you jump in it with some BS comments. Take a hike f'er.
Click to expand...

I lose interest in debating with someone after they display their ignorance of the topic at hand, like you've just done. Your insight has truly exposed you and I rest assured knowing that you easily lose any argument we find ourselves involved in from here on out.

I'll leave you with a little more support for my argument and then I'm done with you. The following are a couple of sites that tend to agree with Texas being one of the top ten of all time. You can argue with me all you want, but can you argue with everyone on the matter??? Next time just shut your mouth and don't make comments such as Texas being all hype. :dis:

http://www.cfrc.com/Archives/Top_Programs_2003.htm

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/rankings/all_time_team_rankings.php

I'm no bigger fan of Texas than you guys, but I'm just a little more educated on college football history than you guys tend to display. :dis:

raylsu · Jan 14, 2005

I-of-the-Tygrr said:

I lose interest in debating with someone after they display their ignorance of the topic at hand, like you've just done. Your insight has truly exposed you and I rest assured knowing that you easily lose any argument we find ourselves involved in from here on out.

I'll leave you with a little more support for my argument and then I'm done with you. The following are a couple of sites that tend to agree with Texas being one of the top ten of all time. You can argue with me all you want, but can you argue with everyone on the matter??? Next time just shut your mouth and don't make comments such as Texas being all hype. :dis:

http://www.cfrc.com/Archives/Top_Programs_2003.htm

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/rankings/all_time_team_rankings.php

I'm no bigger fan of Texas than you guys, but I'm just a little more educated on college football history than you guys tend to display. :dis:
Click to expand...

You're not worth the time to deal with. Proof is that you are a cheap dumbass that can't contribute $12 to run this forum although you have over 1200 posts. I can see if you just joined and still trying to figure out if it is worth your time/money to join...but come on dude...>1,200 posts???

How about you research PayPal and send $12.00 to join this site? Until then, you can STFU.

Tygrr · Jan 14, 2005

raylsu said:

You're not worth the time to deal with. Proof is that you are a cheap dumbass that can't contribute $12 to run this forum although you have over 1200 posts. I can see if you just joined and still trying to figure out if it is worth your time/money to join...but come on dude...>1,200 posts???

How about you research PayPal and send $12.00 to join this site? Until then, you can STFU.
Click to expand...

haha....I love it, nothing left to say so you attempt to attack my status as a member. :hihi:

You truly bore me....

raylsu · Jan 14, 2005

I-of-the-Tygrr said:

haha....I love it, nothing left to say so you attempt to attack my status as a member. :hihi:

You truly bore me....

Click to expand...

you sure that isn't you checking your breath after not using standard personal hygiene guidelines like brushing your teeth?