LSU has to play its three toughest SEC games on the road and this guy thinks LSU has the 2nd easist schedule in the SEC and has no likely losses projected? Sure.
I'm glad to see they take it for granted that LSU will go to Knoxville, Auburn, and Gainesville and win. I for one expect Tennessee to rebound and have a pretty good year (hopefully I'll be wrong).
From the comments below the article: Bama your schedule is just shameful. Florida International? Isn't that where they used to train flight attendants? Was TWA all booked up? Freaking classic.
Look under UL-L! Says that "UL-L exists only on paper just like LSU's 2003 National Championship."o: What an asswipe.:angryfire
They don't take any of them for granted. That's why they are in the "toss-up category". And Red, he doesn't have any likely losses for Auburn, LSU, Georgia, Florida, S. Carolina, or Alabama. He thinks these are the schools that have a chance to win every game. Which I agree with (well except for South Carolina).
The guy's a stringer. No way can Bama take down LSU or Auburn. Not gonna happen with a green offense and shallow depth. The Bear's people are in bondage for many years to come. * Hence, and by default, bama does have "likely losses." * South carolina lost its playmakers. Meat. * UF hasn't proven Meyer's system can hold up under solid 4-3 pressure - ever! * LSU's road schedule should be the posterchild for how not to win a championship - brutal * Tub's teams have been notoriously slow starters .... and WSU and LSU loom early. Suffice to say, the West and East are both up for grabs. There are enough subplots to consume even the slightest of SEC fans ..... even in the offseason. Ya' gotta love CFB :thumb: are you glad Travis Williams is gone?
