1. petition the NCAA for a sixth season? If he does, will the NCAA grant it to him? I think he should because it will increase the value of his stock come next NFL draft. I suspect the NCAA will grant it to him. What do you guys think?
    1 person likes this.
  2. totally agree
    1 person likes this.
  3. I'll sign it!

    Can I sign it?

    :confused:

    I am totally throwed off by the Best Buy guy missing the game. :rolleye33:
  4. Good post topic.

    Hard decison for him.

    Do you stay and play another year (and risk career ending injury) or do you take the money this year for mid - late round pick?

    I would stay but hard to pass up the oppurtunity to earn 6 figures for a few years.
  5. No.
  6. Depends on his family situation, do they need the money right now? I see him going in the late rounds. If he sticks another year and dominates again, I see him going early, and making more money. I think he would make a great 3-4 LB.
  7. I think he DEFINATELY should!

    Look, if the NCAA can grant Jason White and that freak'n thug, Dvorecek--both from OU, medical redshirt years, then a standup guy like Pittman deserves it!

    If he petitions and is denied, then that would be the WORST decision the NCAA has ever made in these types of cases/situations.
  8. Kirston is a solid college DE, but staying another year will not help his draft stock. He'll be a 5th or so round guy this year, and that won't go up any next year - it may go down. If Tyson Jackson comes back, he & Ricky Jean Francois will be our 2 best DEs. Kirston may not even have a starting spot.

    He needs to get in the NFL & make some money while he's young & healthy.
  9. Jean-Francois is a DT/DE, he played both last year, and was just as good at both. I personally would prefer to see him at tackle because we lose 2 senior starting DT.
  10. He was a situational DT though. He didn't play DT full-time, and he's been practicing at DE all year.