The Party of zero morals, zero patriotism, and extreme hypocrisy

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex, Nov 18, 2021.

  1. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    I guess you’re talking about 9/11. That was Arabic Islam.
     
  2. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Like I said, you have a ridiculous notion of what "hypocrisy" means. She was against it, now she's for it because she was swayed by the arguments and pleas of her co-legislators. How is that hypocrisy? Hint: it's not. I used to be for the electoral college, now I'm very staunchly against it. How is that hypocrisy? It's not. The allegory is perfect.

    And, quite frankly, I don't know what you're aiming for here.... would you prefer that she STILL be against it, because I can guarantee you THIS: today you'd be calling her a hypocrite.
     
  3. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Do you really believe that? If so you’re a bigger fool than I thought. There’s no doubt she’s doing it for political expediency. That’s hypocrisy
     
    shane0911 and fanatic like this.
  4. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    So, let's get this straight.... her hypocrisy alone is what's causing her to vote against unfair activities? If that's hypocrisy then we need far more of it. But, like I said, you'd be calling her a hypocrite today if she had come out against the ban. You make ZERO sense.
     
  5. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    @Rex to follow up. How do you know that about Pelosi’s decision? Did she call you to check with you?
    As I said if you believe that I have several bridges and lots of beachfront property for you.
     
  6. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    So, let's get this straight.... her hypocrisy alone is what's causing her to vote against unfair trading activities? If that's hypocrisy then we need far more of it. But, like I said, you'd be calling her a hypocrite today if she had come out against the ban. You make ZERO sense.
     
  7. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,782
    Likes Received:
    6,435
    shane0911 likes this.
  8. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    You're so comically desperate to keep from admitting you're wrong.
     
  9. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    No if she had remained in opposition to the ban, she would have been consistent. There is argument for both sides that can be respected. Her hypocrisy is that I very much doubt she’s changed her opinion; one she’s held forcefully for years for any reason other than hypocritical expediency.
     
  10. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423

Share This Page