USC can't three-peat or three-Pete

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by LSUsupaFan, Dec 28, 2005.

  1. LSUsupaFan

    LSUsupaFan Founding Member

  2. LSUGradin99

    LSUGradin99 I Bleedeth Purple 'N Gold

    Riley's lawyers have always been meticulous when it comes to protecting that trademark!
     
  3. Ch0sn0ne

    Ch0sn0ne At the Track

    I just sent in my request for patent on the word Four-peat, just in case those bastards win, i'll make some money off of them every time they use my word.


    How stupid is that, you can get copyright on words. Who owns ****, ****, damn, and *******? I owe them a ****load of money.

    :dis:
     
  4. 00Tiger

    00Tiger Founding Member

    first they need a back-to-back in order for a three-peat or three-pete in the first place.

    ESPN is going to look really stupid with this whole USC versus every other good team in history segment when they get their asses handed to them by Texas.
     
  5. nittanytiger

    nittanytiger Founding Member

    Did you guys hear Kincade go off on USC yesterday? He was sitting in for Cowherd. He said the last time he looked USC only won 1 championship in 2004 and could not 3-peat WITHOUT repeating. He said look at the record books there are no split titles in there. Beside the 2003 National Champoins it says LSU and that those SC B*****S need to learn how to count.
     
  6. Chip82

    Chip82 Founding Member


    Or are they talking about a three-peat of the Big 12 Champion losing? :)
     

Share This Page