I think Russell has the better arm (no doubt) and in time, may prove to erase any doubts about his in-game decision making (an area that he seemed to be better at as the season wore on).
The only reasonable way to compare the two is to look at the first
full season as the starter for both QB's.
For Leak, 2003:
Leak had -53 net rushing yards and 2 rushing TD's
was
190 of 320 for
2435 yards with
16 TD's and 11 INT's
For Russell, 2005:
Russell had
-22 net rushing yards and 2 rushing TD's
was 180 of 310 for
2434 yards with
15 TD's and
9 INT's
Their #'s are almost identical! But when you consider Russell threw for only 1 yard fewer, dispite 10 less attempts, and was tackled for a loss MUCH LESS than Leak, Russell also threw 2 less INT's.
Now, my question isn't "who's better", it's: When Leak put up those numbers everyone (fans, etc.) was all high on him...but when Russell puts up almost identical numbers--some categories even BETTER than Leak--we can't seem to give him enough credit?!
Personally, I'd take JR over Leak.
Click to expand...