Why is Skip Bertman low-balling Dennis Shaver?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by trackfan, Jul 20, 2007.

  1. trackfan

    trackfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    15
    Skip Bertman is trying to undermine another track coach by telling the board and local media that he's offering Shaver a big pay raise and for some reason he just won't accept it. But the bottom line is that if Shaver continued to work under the old deal without a pay raise, his total compensation next year would be $163,000 at the minimum ($113,000 + $50,000), maybe more, and that's without Nike incentive bonuses. The four-year-old Nike deal has expired and is up for renewal. The going rate these days for track powerhouses is $50,000 - $75,000. For example, John McDonnell at Arkansas, who only coaches men, gets $70,000 from Adidas and Bev Kearney at Texas, who only coaches women, gets $60,000 from Nike. It's inconceivable that Shaver wouldn't get similar money from Nike, considering the fact that he coaches men and women, and both he and Bertman know it. So Bertman is telling Shaver "we'll raise you from $113,000 to $165,000, you'll no longer be doing business with Nike, and from now on we'll keep all the Nike money, including the incentive bonuses", and he's hoping that the board and local media will be unable or unwilling to see through his shell game that he's calling a "generous pay raise".
     
  2. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    I hope this isn't true.
     
  3. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    Maybe because nobody cares about track.
     
  4. GetBackToWork

    GetBackToWork Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    28
    The first post and a rather detailed one concerning a not so frequent topic.

    Wait a minute...Shaver...is that you?
     
  5. crawfish

    crawfish Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,592
    Likes Received:
    149
    how much does pat henry make at aTm?
     
  6. trackfan

    trackfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    15
    Sheldon Mickles gave out the details a few days ago:

    http://www.2theadvocate.com/sports/8544032.html
     
  7. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    If, and that's a big if, this is true, then all tiger fans should be concerned. The overall health of the athletic department is very important and to not give a guy with Shaver's track record (pun intended) a raise seems irresponsible. Maybe I'm wrong but the guy has done well and should paid as one of the top track coaches in the country. Especially if he coaches both men and women.
     
  8. crawfish

    crawfish Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,592
    Likes Received:
    149
    shaver signed the new contract earlier today.. 3 years...165k 1st year 175k 2nd year and 185k 3rd year...
     
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Track is not a revenue sport. Track lines up behind football, basketball, baseball, and womens basketball. That's just the way it is and it's the reason why Pat Henry left. He got pissed that Pokey made more than he did.
     
  10. trackfan

    trackfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    15
    Track doesn't generate revenue anywhere. It doesn't generate revenue at Texas A&M where Pat Henry is being paid $300,000+, it doesn't generate revenue at Oregon where the head coach makes $600,000 and it doesn't generate revenues at Texas where two head coaches (men & women) make a combined salary of $400,000+. By the way, women's basketball may generate revenues at Tennessee, but at LSU, it's the biggest money loser in the athletic department. Last year it lost nearly $1.5 million.

    http://app1.lla.state.la.us/PublicReports.nsf/68D60BC42501601F8625727400545755/$FILE/00000A96.pdf
     

Share This Page