Can someone explain to me why USC is still #5 in the BCS, when they have lost to two if at best mediocre teams?
Because the computer still, as always, looks at strength of schedule. And the Pac-10, whether we like it or not, is highly regarded.
Just another example of the failure of the current system. Also, couldn't have #3 Michigan playing anything less than a #5 in the Grand daddy of them all Rose Bowl......especially not after passing #4 LSU.
HeHe... USC finished at 5 because if they had dropped any lower it would have dropped ND's strength of schedule and kept them out of a BCS bowl game. Never forget the Domers!!
