1. How did he manage them in the 2nd half when it could have meant a lot more?
  2. Because the receiver was going to the ground in the process of catching the ball, he would have had to hold on to the catch through the point of contacting the ground, which he clearly did not do.
    ROY_LA_CA likes this.
  3. How did he manage his last three?
  4. Thanks islstl --- I had made my comment early in the thread and later saw that the point you just reiterated was subsequently made.
    islstl likes this.
  5. Allegedly ​
  6. it’s ok.
    statute of limitations has expired.

    we can talk openly about it now.
    ParadiseiNC and shane0911 like this.
  7. But wait, it WAS ruled a catch, right?
  8. yes it was.
  9. good to see you nootch
  10. So why is izzy saying this? (below)