I see a whole bunch written on the missile. Not so much on the guidance systems, the war heads, and the reentry vehicle.
They have to continue development work on the missile & guidance systems. More importantly as I wrote earlier they have to build the reentry...
That's the first smart thing you've written in a while. [ATTACH] And I already have an IT consultant. My granddaughter.
Don't believe everything you read.
Way too many to list.
#1 Wake me up when you post something intelligent. #2 Never mind.
The missile has range but they have a long way to go to make it a credible threat. They have to design and build a reentry vehicle that will...
Probably China.
That's why my grand daughter is my IT consultant. I know enough to be dangerous.
Thanks for ruining my appetite.
A lengthy, but pretty informative article from the NY Times on the N. Korea missile threat....
I think the chances of that happening are somewhere between Slim & None. Slim has left town and None is saddling up.
[ATTACH]
Don't tell me you're surprised.
If you think a diplomatic solution is going to happen then I suggest you start stocking up on bread, mayo, mustard, and toilet paper.
Pay attention Al. I didn't specify it was this thread.
Just another example of how clueless cut & paste Rex is.
I did a Google search and you are correct. S. Korea doesn't have nukes. N. Korea's development of an ICBM must be stopped. I don't care who does...
Doesn't South Korea have nukes? If their ICBM development isn't stopped Los Angeles may cease to exist.
So what is it? Swedish?
