I'm not the one struggling to accept the definition of anecdotal evidence. By definition, it's without facts. I don't really care who he is (or you are) you can't change the definition of a word just because you want to believe it. You're not Donald Trump. Pretty sure that @asignupe99 doesn't have evidence that the amount of pigmentation in one's skin determines one's feelings on LSU.
Who really cares anyway, you're either a Tiger or you're Tiger bait. Doesn't matter if you're a descendant of Kunte kinte or just your every day garden variety cracker.
Blah blah blah blockhead! What the man is saying has merit and that you choose to not believe it doesn't make it not true. I mean you don't have much of a foundation to go on other than being a moron.
Yet I am the one who hasn't had the need to resort to name-calling to argue my position. Also, am I correct in seeing that you're a "Staff Member" on this forum? LOL. How loose are the standards for that now? Man, this board has really gone downhill. A Staff Member engaged in name-calling and insulting a member because he doesn't grasp the definition of "anecdotal evidence". This is truly Trump's America.
Oh the big bad bully hurt my feelings. Quit acting like a jackass and I won't have to point it out to you.
Criticizing the forum and/or mods is against policy too so let's not criticize what we practice. Not just here but in earlier post you side-swiped him. He's jus more of an in your face kinda guy. Personally, I prefer it straight up. And while we're talking, you seem to be a bit sensitive about racial things. Or maybe it's MCtiger. I'm not sure which "M." I would request thread be locked since it's been run off the track so bad. Either that or maybe a mod could clean it up.
