2nd half offensive effort against Alabama was a fluke

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by DoctorDave, Nov 13, 2010.

  1. TigerBacker70

    TigerBacker70 I'm the Cock of the Walk!

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    243
    I don't know WTF is going on. A great second half against Bama last week and tonight as of this post one QB is 4 for 13 and the other is 4 for 9 against ULM. There's no rhyme or reason to it. It's just the way the Tigers offense is going to be for the foreseeable future. We should be used to this by now. But the D is playing lights out and the running game looks good. Jasper is the new Colt David. Lots of the young players getting meaningful snaps.
     
  2. TigerBacker70

    TigerBacker70 I'm the Cock of the Walk!

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    243
    Michael Ford is a stud.
     
  3. RHans405

    RHans405 Let's Roll

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,181
    Likes Received:
    477
    2nd half offense against ULM must be a fluke as well.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    I'm laughing still at the people who think the LSU offense did well last week. They completed two passes that they normally do not: 75 yards to Randle and the 3rd down conversion thrown by a cold JL. Outside of that, it was miserable as always.

    It's (still) about execution. Easy to get up and focus against great teams like Alabama and Auburn. Apparently not so much for ULM.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. fanatic

    fanatic Habitual Line Stepper

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    13,666
    Likes Received:
    6,013
    Ok, at the time of this post, the score now is 51-0. I don't have access to the game. It is safe to say the offense has picked it up? Either way, there's no hope for you people that are b!tching. 51-0 and you're still not please? Ridiculous!

    :huh::insane:
     
  6. Rex C.

    Rex C. member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    56
    If ANYTHING has been proven to be a fluke - it's this thread.

    Last I checked the score was 51-0 in the fourth. So much for your lack-of-offense argument.
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. KingEmeritus

    KingEmeritus ofthePoint

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    We only had 276 yds of total offense. I'm super excited we got to 50 pts, but it was because of Defense and Special Teams for the most part.
     
  8. DoctorDave

    DoctorDave Guest

    LSU had 276 yds. of offense in the game. Most of the people on this thread have no idea whether this is good or bad.

    As an exercise, go to ncaafootball.com and look up where a team would rank if it averaged 276 yds. of offense per game. You might learn something.
     
  9. paducahmichael

    paducahmichael Tiger Band Class of '73

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,366
    Likes Received:
    298


    That's what CLM wants Nutt-case to think.

    "Be vewy, vewy quiet. I'm hunting wabbits.":geaux:
     
  10. northernvatiger

    northernvatiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    14,675
    Likes Received:
    6,169
    It didn't really matter tonight. We were working with short fields all night, plus we got 2 defensive TD's. We didn't turn the ball over, and all we needed were for the QB's to manage the game, which they did. The defense played lights out.

    We are now 9-1. Most of us thought we would finish with 9 wins. We have the chance to run the table and finish the regular season 11-1. Not too shabby for a team that has struggled so much on offense...

    :geauxtige
     

Share This Page