1. Agreed. Can't be any worse if play the youngsters.
    shane0911 and LSU_4_LIFE like this.
  2. How in the fuck did Emery get reps with the 1’s all camp knowing he was academically ineligible due to grades from the spring/summer.

    What the hell is going on inside that building?
    northernvatiger, shane0911 and kcal like this.
  3. Don't you think it would be a good thing for the other three starters to get some game experience against a team like McNeese? Might boost their morale.
  4. i thought we had a gm for this?
  5. Nope, theyll just get some orange slices.
  6. I see this as a good thing. Opportunity for the younger guys to step up and show us what they have. I don’t trust this coaching staff is putting “the best” on the field. I want to see it for myself.

    Anthony, Clark, Baskerville, Harris, and a lot of these o-linemen getting starts strictly because they’re “seniors” is bullshit. If they’re the best we have, then recruiting rankings are bogus. Because every player behind these guys on the depth chart were much more highly recruited.
    shane0911 likes this.
  7. I think it would be a good thing for the guys behind them to challenge them for their jobs! None of these guys have it, we’ve seen them. Let’s see the others now.
  8. I don't put a lot of faith in recruiting rankings. I think a coach watching game film has more insight than the so called recruiting gurus.
  9. So you're basing your conclusion based on what you saw in one game?
  10. Well, who has the best recruits?

    Alabama
    Georgia
    Clemson
    Ohio State
    LSU
    Texas A&M


    Who is the outlier? Because those recruiting rankings are working for everyone else. Just sayin....
    shane0911 likes this.