Discussion in 'OTHER SPORTS Forum' started by JohnLSU, Jan 13, 2010.
Hey, this is a family forum. Ya'll stop using the D word
this is the exact reason why hardly anyone reads SI crap anymore.
I'm surprised (even by SI standards) they would publish an issue with such a stupid cover comment.
*They win their first title since 1992.
*They need officiating and fortune to win several games.
*They're in a conference with two teams who have each won 2 titles in the last six years.
*They won a game against a team who lost their star QB on the first drive of the game.
Sounds like a dynasty to me. :huh:
Maybe because Bama also claimed a recruiting national title and claims national titles only recognized by their fans...maybe SI figured they would beat them to it. :hihi:
I think LSU deserves credit for Alabama's national title. If not for LSU, Alabama doesn't win that title. If the National Media wants to credit Saban with half a title for LSU in 07, which they have done, then LSU deserves half the title for Alabama in 09. If we don't hire Nick Saban, he doesn't win a championship, and doesn't blow up as a coach, and Bama doesn't hire him. So, congrats LSU on half a title.
Well, if you are talking about a Dynasty of lucky breaks, well then that may apply.
Remember Destiny? She was Mike Price's "girlfriend" before he ever coached a game at bama.
score one for the barners!!!!:thumb:
Someone please delete this fuggin thread......
If Sports Illustrated is being offensive, people deserve to know about it.
Better solutions are:
1) don't every buy Sports Illustrated again
2) contact Sports Illustrated and let them know you aren't happy with their product. I wouldn't mention the part about you being an LSU fan, because SI will just think you are biased. Write them like you are a neutral sports fan but you still think their Bama love is obsessive and irritating.
Contact Us - SI.com
Sports Illustrated Sales and Marketing Information
The parent company is Time Inc.
Time Inc | Company profile from Hoover's