right. what you need to realizs is that faith is stupid, its not a legit method to acquire information.
I wasnt arguing against that I have taken 4 statistic classes to know every unknown is not 50/50 I think he made a mistake posting that.
why does it have to be one of the "God's" described by religion? I am talking about truth and the pursuit of truth. you are talking about smashing old dogma's and this conversation was past that point of that before you ever became involved and started trying to project your own distaste for religious dogmas onto everyone else.
again, faith is not a means to an end of information. this is something that is lost on you, there is such a thing as being too logical. you are the definition of it.
i am asking you what your god is, an why it is true. here is the plan: 1. you tell me about your god 2. i tell you why u are a fucking idiot.
talk to the guy who said he can prove god doesnt exis. not sure who said that, but it wasnt me. i have said the opposite on this board maybe 100 times at least. i[/quote] then why are you disputing my claim that there is a God. If you cannot prove that God does not exist then who are you to dispute my claim that God does exist? you are talking in circles now martin. this circular reasoning will only leave you chasing your tail friend.
there is only ne way to acquire information. empirical evidence. one we forget this, all is lost and we should raise out children to be strippers that quote astrology to each other and say they are "spiritual". i mean, what is the point of being irrational, what value is there in being a fuckhead?
so you have a god and its information, thats what this amounts too. Life is about acquiring information. lol
