1. 4th. quarter, a little late.


    We lose players all the time, you need to reload, like everyone else.

    Best of luck the rest of the year.
  2. Sure they could but they couldn't win a division with that defense. They are about 2 or 3 notches below Auburn's 2010 squad.



    If ONE TD pass is defended they win the game.

    Patterson hasn't lost much in the last couple of years. He needs to learn a little humility. Of course, with that schedule he'll win more than he loses.
  3. And unfortunately when LSU does lose players (scheduled and unscheduled)...........they lose games too. I will be at the game today.:geauxtige

    It has been a very long time since both my teams went 0-2 on the same day.
  4. Same here, section 102.
  5. The thing about stats is they don't tell a realistic story.
    Teams that have great stats but play weak opponets tend to look better on paper.
    LSU had it's stats aginst top competition. Just look at the ranked teams we have to play aginst. When a team like uo allows only 250 yards offense aginst an unranked opponet it reads the same on the stat sheet as lsu allowing 250 yards offense aginst a team from the sec ranked in the top 20. You see the talking head cheerleaders on espn talk about how a team has such a great offense or defense when they play one team in the top 20 and maybe one team in the top ten where lsu plays five or six teams in the top 20 and 2or 3 top 10 teams.
    The thing is that these teams beat their chest and scream about how great they are at beating nobodies. It's a false sense of accomplishment and they are either too stupid or too dishonest to admit it.