It is a reference to "lolcats," a somewhat recent internet culture phenomenon, in which cats are pictured with poorly structured sentences as captions. icanhazcheezburger.com
That is really a pretty good suggestion. By having a Pac 10 CG it makes them, read that USC, a little more legit to go to the BCSCG. If you want to talk about weak conference schedules let's talk about the Big 10. Most of them play teams like Northern Ohio for their OOC's and the conference basically sucks. When Boise plays so called real teams they usually win. There is, of course, the Oklahoma game but this season they beat Oregon which hasn't lost since and beat Cal worse than USC did. When they played Boise they had their best HB(the puncher) and didn't make a first down until mid way through the 3rd period. That's pretty much domination. Right now if we really want to be honest about strength of conference schedule then the BCSNC should always be between the SEC and Big 12 winner.
I think it would be fantastic for the Pac 10 to expand to 12 teams and admit Boise St. and Utah. But what does the conference have to gain by admitting Boise St. and Utah? Nothing. The current member schools would never agree to it (I wouldn't either). I seriously doubt it will ever happen, but I guess it's possible. And as much as I cant stand the Trojans, I give credit where it's due. They have had one of the better OOC schedules of any top team in recent years. A wacky idea that would never fly but I think would be cool is relegation. The team that comes in last each year in each BCS conference gets relegated to a second tier conference. The champion of those lesser conferences gets to step up to play with the Big Boys. If they avoid being last they stay. It's impractical for a host of reasons but I think it would make for some interesting NCAA football each year.
How so? Maybe I'm not understanding what you mean. When a pie is sliced up into 12 pieces they are each smaller than if it's cut into 10. If they were in the Pac 12, they wouldn't be going to or contending for a BCS berth every year becasue they'd both have 2 or 3 conferences losses at least. Just like in the SEC.
yeah but wouldn't both schools generate money for the pac -10? Maybe i don't know how things work, but it also gives you a better chance to get in better bowls that pay more money.
Wonder what Oklahoma and Oregon would say to Boise??? Granted their sched this year outside of Oregon win is pretty bad but can all BCS schools say their schedules are tough enough?? What does Alabama say about the complete butt kicking they took in the SB??? Should teams in the Big East and ACC last year actually say they play in a "real conference"?
It was not too long ago that Cincy, Louisiville and USF were CUSA, they are not the annual whipping boys of the Big Least.:geaux:
