Biggest surprise this year?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by Blade Brown, Oct 2, 2006.

  1. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    This defense will have as many, and probably more in the NFL - plus they will be taken higher in the draft.
     
  2. sojon

    sojon Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    your defense being as good as its currently ranked is teh suprise to me
    #1 in yards per game for a team that lost most of its top tacklers from the year before....
     
  3. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    I'm surprised that our net punting is so horrible. Our punter averages 42 yards which is average-good, but we are allowing return 18.2 yards per punt. Dead last in the SEC. #74 nationally.

    We have been a very good kick/punt coverage team in the last four years.
     
  4. friedriches

    friedriches mr. t

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,819
    Likes Received:
    249
    I would definately agree that the biggest suprise has been the running game (or lack thereof). It's been really hard to watch the team just drive and drive and drive and get nowhere. There are flashes of what we need, but it's really puzzling.

    There's lots of theories out there as to why the team isn't running effectively, and I haven't really studied it enough to form my own opinion why we haven't been able to rush properly.
     
  5. TigerKid05

    TigerKid05 Say Whaa!?!?

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,944
    Likes Received:
    199
    I expected the defence to be good, but not that good. I also like how the young guys on our team are doing.

    I thought running would have been better but I knew it wasn't going to be great coming in to this year but, it's sad to see that we're making everyone look like they have awesome rush defence.

    Another thing...Russell has really impressed me and I'll admit that last year I was kind of rooting for Flynn to take over the starting job but now, no way. Russell is the guy. He looks awesome everytime he touches the ball.
     
  6. G-LSU

    G-LSU Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    44

    It is puzzling to me as well with how inneffective our run attack has become. Our pass blocking is great, and run blocking is good...I just don't get how we can't hit the holes or they close up so quickly. We've only played on good defense this year.....

    Ready to chew on some swamp meat!!!
    :geauxtige :geauxtige
    :geauxtige :geauxtige
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    LSU fans are disppointed because no Joe Addai type rusher has emerged yet. However it is important to note that LSU is not completely ineffective at running the football.

    LSU is ranked #5 in the SEC in rushing with 144 yards per game. That is in the SEC upper tier and ahead of ranked teams like Alabama, Tennessee, and Georgia.

    LSU has 14 rushing touchdowns, which leads the SEC.

    So we may be disappointed that the running game is not as strong as the last few years, but we are far from having a complete lack of production running the football--especially near the goal line.
     
  8. bhelmLSU

    bhelmLSU Founding Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    great point:thumb:
     
  9. LSU_Fan_In_OK

    LSU_Fan_In_OK Founding Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    643
    Likes Received:
    37
    Running Game without a doubt
     
  10. friedriches

    friedriches mr. t

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,819
    Likes Received:
    249
    But really and truly, red, anyone can run it in from 2 yards out. All you need is a shove from Reggie Bus- the offensive line, I mean, and you've got it in there. I was referring to the lack of long gains/consistent decent ones, especially against the weaker competition.
     

Share This Page