A friend of mine believes that the only reason Michael Clayton will be back next year is so that he can play defense full time. His "sources" tell him that our receivers will be deep enough next year so that Clayton can play defense. Apparently, the "thought" is that his best chance for success as a pro is as a defensive back and not a receiver. I have heard Saban say that MC would be the best defensive back in the SEC if he played defense. Sounds like an awful 'lot of speculation. Has anyone else heard this ?