1. Well thank you for enlightening me. I am forever changed. It's played out is why I don't want to discuss it anymore. You have a different view that I do. Wow that's amazing isn't it. You should really get a crystal ball and some tarot cards, and a cool head wrap with jewel in the center.
  2. i am curious do you think perhaps the lady who got shot is a bit to blame for whatever she said that set off the lunatic? why or why not? what if i can demmonstrate that she was saying things that made the lunatic angry?
  3. Show me where I said anyone was a bit to blame.
  4. That is actually a more plausible theory. Palin is blamed with absolutely no evidence to back it up. Of course, LaSalle hears it from liberals and repeats it in hopes of getting a cracker.
  5. No that is not plausible in any manner. The reason this guy shot these people is because he is crazy. It ends there.
  6. yeah because there are so many liberals here on this board, i just aim to please them all. please show where I said Palin was to blame, in fact i have said the opposite.

    If I get up on a podium and say, "you know what, all conservatives and tea party members are, are a bunch of redneck, inbred, chicken sh*t, mother f*ckers, and we should do everything we can to get rid of them. This is a war, we need to rise up, and take these f*ckers out, put the crosshairs on em, they have to go."

    For 1, it should be no surprise that (if I am famous) someone take me literally and goes and shoots Rand Paul, or Michele Bachmann. For 2 it shouldn't be a surprise if some idiot tea party lunatic or conservative lunatic, tries to take me out. What I said was irresponsible, and had I not said it, could have avoided the violent act.

    How hard is that to figure out?

  7. I agree, but I could at least argue the point that the person who actually got shot in the head was the one that set the shooter off.
  8. Not all. You worship at the altar of Yosemite Sam.
  9. you said:

    "cross hair thing was irresponsible."

    what exactly did you mean, if not that she is to blame for something? what was her "responsibility", that she didnt manage properly? who was she responsible to, and for what?

    and was the woman who got shot acting irresponsibly? clearly her words did anger the lunatic, right? should she, as you might say "not be shocked" that her words caused her to get shot?

    OR PERHAPS PEOPLE SHOULD SAY WHATEVER THEY WANT WITHOUT YOU JUDGING WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE
  10. of course! i think sabanfan understands my point i was trying to point out to lasalle how absurd it is to make connections between lunatics and anyone else being "responsible" in any way for anything that leads to lunatics doing anything.

    lasalle is hellbent on being stupidly biased, and he now realizes he has made a stupid point, because he has thought about how stupid tipper gore and whoever are when they blame violent video games and music and such. but he doesnt want to admit it.