I don't believe that. You say no RB can be MVP cause there haven't been enough 100 yard games. If you hold Randall to those same standards (in qb terms) he hasn't had enough production to be considered MVP either. Where's your logic.
Bottom line registered guest is that LSU would have more then 2 L’s had it not been for Randall period point blank. There is no argument about that. Look at Randall's production by how many wins we have this year.
:rofl: :lol: :rofl: ....but only cause you say so :hihi: That's horrible logic. You don't look at his production by how many wins we have. If it weren't for Russell, we would have lost to OSU. Does Randall get the credit for that win? Randall is not the sole reason we have the wins we have so it's ridiculous to measure his production by our wins. He didn't even start every game and sure didn't play for the entirety of each game so your logic stinks. It's like me saying I look at JA's production by how many wins we have this year. Just ridiculous, then again I'd expect that from you.
Little boy, do you know why Randall didn't start every game? B/C LSU wants to break in a new QB for next year and yes had Randall not ran in the 2-point conversion we would have lost that game. The one game Randall didn't start he had to come in and win it so go take your remembery pills and lay down for a little while. You had quite a day so far.
Here are a few Randall stats; 65% pass completion rate and only 5 picks almost 300 years rushing. That’s why he is my MVP.
My MVP is Joseph Addai. He had one hell of a game vs. Florida and he donates .02 a day to poor children in Africa.
I agree 100%, Spears is the team leader and best player on the team while Randall has been the man on the offense by default. I still like Randall but he is not the team MVP.
I think this was just a joke thread. Anyone who would suggest him as MVP honestly you would really have to wonder about. I think the team would be much better without him starting.