Dad posts pic of kid w/ gun, Family Services threatens to take kid

Discussion in 'New Roundtable' started by KyleK, Mar 20, 2013.

  1. wjray

    wjray .-.. ..- -.- .

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,313
    Likes Received:
    535
    Check out this document. Doesn't get a lot of play these days, but I think the fourth amendment to it might apply here. http://www.usconstitution.net/const.pdf
     
    mctiger likes this.
  2. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,733
    I have been chastened for making point-by-point rebuttals, so I tried not to state the obvious.

    What laws? Modern tort law, specifically invasion of privacy, a commonly used cause of action in legal pleadings. More specifically, intrusion of solitude: physical or electronic intrusion into one's private quarters.

    What Constitutional right? The fourth amendment, which which guards citizens in their "homes, houses, papers, and effects" against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause.
     
  3. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    What search? What seizure? They asked questions, were asked to leave and they left. No search was conducted. Nothing was seized.

    Shit, I'll post the text of the 4th Amendment to make it easy for you:
    Again, what law was broken? What Constitutional Right was violated?
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,733
    Only because it was thwarted by a citizen who had a lawyer.

    Repeating yourself is getting you nowhere. You have been answered.

    The aforementioned laws and rights were threatened. An attempt was certainly made to search without a warrant when no evidence of law-breaking existed. We are protected from unwarranted searches by law. Even if it was thwarted by a citizen it was still an unwarranted search.
     
  5. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    LMAO... You are so full of fucking shit. A search that never takes place is not a search. Just answer the damn question and stop dancing around it. You KNOW nothing illegal happened. "Almost" happened is nowhere in the realm of actually happening and you look foolish for trying to draw the comparison.
     
  6. plotalot

    plotalot Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,325
    Likes Received:
    468
    Two separate government agencies got together in an attempt to violate a family's rights through lies and deception. If it were two of us, instead of government goon squads, I'd bet one or both of us would be facing conspiracy charges.
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,733
    Your indian name is "Hair Splitter". Just because an unwarranted search is thwarted does not mean it never happened. Officials showed up at a persons porch and officially tried to search the house. if you can't understand what was wrong here, I can't help you.

    Note that no one is agreeing with you, speaking of "full of shit".
     
    gynojunkie likes this.
  8. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,558
    Likes Received:
    23,813
    Not our problem if he has sand in his pussy, just let him be amigo.
     
  9. gyver

    gyver Rely on yourself not on others.

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    717
  10. KyleK

    KyleK Who, me? Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    9,109
    Likes Received:
    3,365

Share This Page