Dude it wasn't his neighbor asking about his fucking lawn fertalizer. This was a government offical acting in a government capacity, asking questions that he did not have the right to ask. And read up a bit, because a search did happen. The house was searched for guns that could be easily accessed by children. Now quit being such a dick hole and admit you are being dense.
There have also been additional developments related to the investigation that was attempted by Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) and the Carney’s Point police. The Moores’ attorney Evan Nappen contacted TheBlaze with an update. On Monday, DCPP informed Shawn Moore that he would not need to open his gun safe for their review…unless he wanted to do that. Additionally, the DCPP worker who allegedly threatened to take away Moore’s children if he did not cooperate with them, has contacted Shawn to tell him that he had passed several checks and once they got responses a couple more, DCPP believes they can close the case within two weeks. If they do complete their work within that time period, the agency will have spent an entire month investigating a single complaint that was filed anonymously.
The police violated their rights like looking at porn gets you laid. I'm using the definition that SCOTUS uses. You're using the definition that Fox News uses. Me >>> You
The only way to figure out who's right is to have the issue litigated. Yes, I'm a lawyer who does quite a bit of criminal defense work. Based on what I've read about this issue -- granted it's only been from some, not all, of the links on this thread -- I'd feel comfortable about filing a motion to suppress any evidence gathered as the result of this activity. Whether or not it would be successful depends on too many variables to list here. However, I'd have no qualms about signing such a motion, fully realizing that my signature means that the motion is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law.
Eve'r damned word of my response was in the King's English, I do believe. Yes, in my opinion he is wrong.
