Dear Mr Kiffin

Discussion in 'OTHER SPORTS Forum' started by islstl, Oct 24, 2009.

  1. HatcherTiger

    HatcherTiger Freedom Isn't Free

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,878
    Likes Received:
    736
    Both! :thumb:
     
  2. TerryP

    TerryP Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    2,068
    Ya know, there isn't a bit of difference in the UT defense of '08 vs this season?
     
  3. DRC

    DRC TigerNator

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    374
    Oh really? First off, they play a completely different scheme. Secondly, they held their 3 biggest rivals to much lower point totals this year. Florida, Alabama & Georgia scored 85 points on them in 2008, 54 this year. I would say 10 fewer points per game is SUBSTANTIALLY different.

    They have also cut down on the opponents time of possession and improved the dreaded 3rd and chavis percentage that so many Tenn fans complained about.

    More importantly, Monte Kiffin has brought some dignity and stability to that staff. The administration is extremely happy with Monte Kiffin and quietly talk about him being more important than his son. The players are buying into his defense in spades and as they become more accustomed to his play calls expect better overall defensive stats in the future.
     
  4. ParadiseiNC

    ParadiseiNC don't worry, be happy

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,687
    Likes Received:
    4,330
    I am sure there are many trains of thought here, but to me, we should have wanted bama to lose. They are in the west, and an SEC loss by Bama helps LSU. A loss by Tennessee is meaningless to us. I get that you want bama to be as high rated as possible when we play them and beat them, but two SEC losses by bama help us more than a higher ranking when we beat them, IMO.
     
  5. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Being that we only have 1 loss and we play them. It helps us if they have that #2 or #1 ranking when we play them. So i was actually for Bama to win, because we play them, and control our own destiny. If we had 2 losses of course, root against them. That being said, i wouldn't have shed a tear if Tennessee would have beaten them, in fact its really hard to keep my line of thought when it comes to Alabama because i hate them with every fiber of my being.
     
  6. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    It all depends on what you're going for. I'm still shooting for a national championship so in that case my logic is correct. Your logic lends itself more to winning the SEC (nothing wrong with that). To get to the SECCG, it would be better for Bama to lose, but I want us to make an impression on the pollsters by beating #1 Bama and #1 UF.

    If you can't tell, I like to swing for the fences. Of course, this kind of thinking got me two tickets to the NCG in 2007 on ticketreserve.com after our second loss.
     
  7. LSUtiger327

    LSUtiger327 Pow right in da kissa

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,132
    Likes Received:
    688
    correct a mundo.

    put me in the SEC cg crowd but i understand your logic.
     

Share This Page