Larry Schweikart @LarrySchweikart FL early vote (again, these are just R/D ballots, not vote "counting"): Rs down only 5,000. They made up 103,000 votes in 2 hours. 9:26 AM · Nov 3, 2020·Twitter Web App
Thomas Paine said it best and those who follow Trump have and will. “I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man.” —Thomas Paine, “The American Crisis”
https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcre...-changes-in-pennsylvania-voting-rules-n268795 When the Pennsylvania Legislature refused to amend Pennsylvania election laws in a manner requested by Dem. Gov. Wolf, Democrat interest groups filed suit in Pennsylvania state court seeking the same changes. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court eventually issued a decision that granted the Plaintiffs some of the relief they had sought. Most significantly, the Court ordered that mailed ballots did not need to be received by elections officials on November 3 as required by statute, but could be accepted and counted so long as they arrived by November 6 — if they were postmarked on or before Nov. 3. The basis of making the change was that the Pennsylvania state constitution grants the judiciary authority to rewrite state laws to avoid constitutional infirmity. The Pennsylvania GOP filed a challenge in the Supreme Court — based on a VERY interesting claim that has never been addressed by the Supreme Court. The US Constitution, Article II. §1, Clause 2 states: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…. The Pennsylvania GOP is challenging the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s extension of the ballot receipt deadline on the basis that the plain language of Art. II, Sec.1, cl. 2 states that the manner of selecting electors — which is what each state’s election actually accomplishes — is to be done as determined by the Legislature of each state, not by any court. If successful, such an outcome would eliminate the ability of state courts to make changes to state election law on the eve of an election. Whichever party controls a state’s legislature would have control of the election process, independent of the state’s judiciary. This issue was previously before the Court, but on a 4-4 vote, the Court was unable to act and the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court stood.
That's true but she has aligned herself with the radical leftist socialist agenda. If the Democrats take control of the Senate I would hope there would be enough moderates to vote down her wildest proposals but I wouldn't hold my breath
Nov 3rd should be the deadline for your vote to be in...if they want to move the day then move the day....but determine that well in advance
