Now now... Lets play fair and play by the system in place, the BCS. This reminds me of USC (and some Aubarn fans!) coming here and trying the same thing on us last year...... Giving us SOS ratings from systems that do not matter, trying to validate why USC was "better" than LSU. BCS overall SOS rating: Link #14...Oklahoma #19...Southern Cal #22...Aubarn Some of the individual BCS components SOS ratings: Jeff Sagarin SOS rating: Link #7....Southern California #13...Oklahoma #60...Aubarn Anderson & Hester SOS rating: Link #25...Oklahoma #26...USC #36...Aubarn Colley matrix SOS rating: Link #9....Oklahoma #18...USC #25...Aubarn
Don't diss on Rich Tellshow either. He's the man when it comes to BCS rankings! Aside from statboy, err islstl.
I actually didnt read the site or go to the link. I just saw geocities and well...you know the story. My bad!
Some of us around here lived and died on Tellshow's BCS rankings during the course of the 2003 season. He was right on the money all the way through and predicted the rise of LSU a couple months before it happened (assuming LSU would win out). At a time when nobody nationally was giving LSU credit, he was giving it to LSU.
