Even on the other board whose name I won't mention, I said that Gore should NOT run and would NOT get the nomination. Anybody who wasn't intelligent enough to run on the Clinton fiscal record doesn't run the best campaign. I still remember his words at the Democratic National Convention which were almost exactly like "I'm not going to run on our record of prosperity of the past 8 years but run on what we will do in the future." HUH???? People KNOW how the last 8 years turned out and who was responsible for it, CLINTON!! They know that everytime the "fiscal conservative" pretendees (i.e. GOP) get into office, they BORROW and SPEND. And Gore also blew another chance during one of the debates when the moderator asked Gore if he thought Sapling was qualified to be president. He should have said NO! and basically said the guy's numbers don't add up, didn't even know what happened to the Byrd defendants (said everyone was going to be put to death which was inaccurate since one was not), etc. I want a Democratic candidate who will PUBLICLY say that Sapling has proven himself incompetent in trying to make policies, all of which have failed miserably. Basically, he should say that Sapling is simply not up to the job and has proven it by his countless mistakes during this term. He had made the fiscal situation of this country worse, made the environment worse, starts commissions to study issues and then rejects them when they don't come out his own way, doesn't understand that this country's principles are based upon EVIDENCE and PROOF being presented when making accusations, etc.. Thus, the Democrats need an aggressive candidate who will not be afraid to point out all of Sapling's failures. And IF Sapling dares to try to call the person as non-supportive of American's actions against terrorism, say that the American action is to point out when someone tries to take away freedoms by hiding behind the American flag.