Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Get out of here with logic and common sense. We are supposed to just believe her and move along.
  2. How was there "spillage"? Be specific.
  3. Light bends around you and you ask if I am dense?
  4. But was your email classified? Not classified attached documents, because there were none. I'm taking about your interdepartmental email. Was it classified?
  5. LOL
  6. any classified info that is not where it is supposed to be. that could be TS info in a S doc, eg. it does not have to get to the public.
  7. In other words, you don't have a clue. You can't name an instance. You can't cite a source for this.
  8. i do, and the story is not ludicrous to me. i would guess this is standard for SES level. classification is always a vague concept that largely has to do with context.
  9. clearly talking out of your ass and reguritating politico articles. try a little humility. no one can know everything.

    again, info does not have to be public for there to be spillage (one type of improper handling of classified information).
    Bengal B likes this.
  10. Evasion and bullshit. I ask you again. Did any of these emails "spill"?

    No.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.