Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The key phrase here is "SHE considered these to be personal emails, not work emails.". The FBI may well consider them to be work emails.
  2. And they may not.
  3. Yet she maintained no privilege log and is in violation of the records retention laws which govern agency heads.
  4. Moot point. They still had to be archived by her commingling of personal and federal emails. She is in violation of the law. What matters is if it is a technical violation or a willful violation to obstruct justice.
  5. So you say. Department Secretaries have a lot of flexibility. If they charge her with a crime, then we will see.
  6. More Hillarity.....the Russians attempted 5 hacks on her "secured" server.
    Bengal B likes this.
  7. how many successful?
  8. Here's the funny/ironic part.....none because she would have had to click on a link. Of course she claims to be technologically challenged but how do we know, at this point? And if her server were really of the "secure" type that she claimed, she wouldn't have been getting Russian spam.
  9. No, that would be the relevant part. :D

  10. Great new nickname for the Hilledebeast

    She might have clicked in it if she thought it was an offer for a free trial penis enlarger.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.