I need any of you Pansy Dems to please watch that video (it's not a commentary or opinion, it's just real life statements juxtaposed with one another), and tell me how you, in good conscience, vote for this person?
state that the words are taken out of context and deflect the conversation to something Trump related.......now.
sure but its more complicated than that. just because someone marks a document classified doesn't mean it is classified. there are relatively few that can definitively classify (oca), everyone else should refer to reference documents. that often isn't done properly.
No, just follow the legal rules. "its unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or describable damage to the national security" AND the information deals with at least one issue bullet below: (i) Military plans, weapons systems, or operations; (ii) Foreign government information;**see note below (iii) Intelligence activities (including covert action), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology; (iv) Foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources; (v) Scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the national security; (vi) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities; (vii) Vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, infrastructures, projects, plans, or protection services relating to the national security; or (viii) The development, production, or use of weapons of mass destruction. Also noted in this section of the code: "In classifying information, the public's interest in access to government information must be balanced against the need to protect national security information."
