Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. this is the kind of thinking I was talking about when I said you have a penchant for finding a good conspiracy. when things do not work out your way you like to find a "reason" for it. now Comey has cleared Clinton and you are still waiting on the "real" story.
  2. imo this is the heart of the matter and what Comey kept coming back to time after time.
  3. It's still illegal by the letter of the law.

    Otherwise, any Tom Dick or Harry could just, throw documents away.
  4. I have provided links to FBI cases where people were prosecuted and they confirmed NO CRIMINAL INTENT WAS FOUND.

    Further, it wasn't JUST careless, it was extreme carelessness. On top of that, we now have proof HRC lied to congress.

    Now both her and Bill can scratch that off their list.

    Finally, the misdemeaner portion of the laws considered do not require intent. This would, at the least, strip and revoke any future clearance, as Comey explained.
    shane0911 likes this.
  5. But that's not what YOU said all along. You said over and over they would find nothing.

    Not only did they find classified information, they found SAP level, proved she lied, and found thousands of deleted emails.

    So please, spare us the, "she did no wrong".

    Any normal person would have. Clearances revoked. Not fit for office. As Comey explained.

    Yet she walks away with nothing.
  6. She was under oath when she lied to congress btw.

    Just like Bill. Nothing will happen.

    You know, people blame republicans for this investigation, yet all HRC had to do was tell the truth and none of this would have happened.

    In fact, if she used a work sever at the state, Benghazi would never have been an issue as they could have reviewed the information instantly.
  7. Anyone who believes Clintons bullshit has no business calling someone else stupid.
  8. Kinda hard to accept that logic after she spoke about NOT doing what she did, to others- wouldn't you agree?
    shane0911 likes this.
  9. When is the last time you supported a candidate who towed your line of beliefs 100%? I'm guessing never. And it's not that I support Trump. I would vote for Satan himself if it were a choice between the devil and the cunt. Trump will likely turn out to be a terrible president. But we aren't sure about that. He may some how rise to mediocrity or even greatness. We already know 100% that Cunton would be the worst president ever. 'She could give lying lessons to Nixon. On second thought, Nixon's lies we a lot more believable. Maybe she should take lessons from Bill. At least he is good at it.
  10. Clinton-Zombies go back and read all your arguments. What you're saying is that by the technical letter of the law she would not likely be judged guilty by a jury of her peers. Even if you are right in that assessment you have to admit there is a pattern. With the Clintons these things are always just barely not provable. Except of course when Bill blew his load on the dress of someone who was smart enough to keep the evidence - with the help of a friend.

    Why don't you give a shit about things like integrity, honesty, transparency, - you know Bernie stuff. Because I didn't agree with almost anything Bernie said but I trust him and there are things I admire about him. But it doesn't matter if the Clintons espoused everything I stand for I still couldn't support them, because they are the slimiest politicians this side of Edwin Edwards. But you don't care about that do you? I wonder, can you rationalize the slime off of a slug.
    HalloweenRun, Bengal B and shane0911 like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.