How accurate is the "star" rating system

Discussion in 'LSU RECRUITING' started by Beaux-Bo, Nov 21, 2007.

  1. DwayneBowned

    DwayneBowned Founding Member

    And the likely top 5 for next year, Dorsey, McFadden, Woodson, Jake Long and Chris Long are all 4 star guys, except for Chris Long who was 3 stars
     
  2. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    First round average star rating for last year = 3.75
    Mean star rating = 4
     
  3. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    So the mean is 3.75 (i.e., the average)

    Not sure what you mean by the mean, you know what I mean?
     
  4. areed7

    areed7 Founding Member

    I assume he meant median with the 3.75.
    mode would be 4.

    Wow, I must have done awesome in 5th grade math...
     
  5. Texsport

    Texsport Founding Member

    20% of the players drafted in the 2007 NFL draft had a2 or less star rating coming out of high school!

    Texsport
     
  6. jesuit_flyer

    jesuit_flyer Founding Member

    :huh:

    Out of the top 32 draft picks:

    5 Stars - 5 - 16%
    4 Stars - 17 - 53%
    3 Stars - 7 - 22%
    2 Stars - 3 - 9%
    1 Star/not ranked/walk-on's - 0

    Have to say the ranking systems do a good job of initially spotting talent and categorizing these players. What do you guys think?
     
  7. TigerBait3

    TigerBait3 Guest

    Well only 30 or so players are out of thousands are 5*s so of course it is going to be like that.
     
  8. Texsport

    Texsport Founding Member


    First of all, I said 20% had less than 3 stars! How exactly does 5*s prove your point?

    How many 4* and 3* players were there?

    Additionally, since there are about 1,800 players in the NFL---32 players in the first round of any single year is actually an insignificant sample.

    20% of 1,800 would be about 360 players in the NFL, that no rating service thought was even a good college prospect, much less pro material.

    Anyone can see the talent of the 1st round guys! The trick is finding a number of miss-rated players to fill your team out with. That applies to both college and pro recruiting.

    Those 360 low ranked players made someone's program better than was expected.

    Texsport
     
  9. Texsport

    Texsport Founding Member

    If the rating services are so accurate, what happened to Notre Dame and Michigan?

    They've both had Top 10 recruiting class almost every year for 5 or more years running.

    Texsport
     
  10. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Fat Weiss sucks.

    I have no answer as to Michigan's problem.
     

Share This Page